About Will Preston

Illustrated avatar of Will Preston

I’m Will Preston. I research and write everything on this site. I am not a doctor, I have no medical training, and nothing here should be mistaken for a consultation.

A desk with a laptop, notebook, reading glasses, blister packs and a stethoscope

Let’s deal with the name first

It’s a joke. It’s also the reason you’re here, which is rather the point.

Men don’t go looking for this information calmly. They search at 1am, using words they’d never say out loud in a surgery, and they land on pages engineered to convert that discomfort into a subscription. The name is a door. What’s behind it is meant to be the opposite of what usually follows.

I don’t sell a pill. There is no house supplement, no proprietary blend, no private-label anything. The domain is a punchline, not a product.

Why I write under a pen name

Will Preston is a pen name. I’d rather tell you that plainly than have you work it out.

The reason is simple: this is a site about erectile dysfunction, semen volume and hair loss, and I’d prefer my own name not be the first result when someone searches it. That’s the same instinct that brings most people here in the first place.

What I won’t do is use the pen name to imply something I’m not. There is no invented medical degree behind it, no fake clinic, no stock-photo team of experts. It’s one person who reads studies, and the sourcing is there so you can check the work rather than take my word for it. If that’s not enough for you, that’s a reasonable position: go and read the guidelines yourself. I’ve linked all of them.

The contact address is real and I answer it.

How I actually work

I start from primary sources: clinical guidelines from bodies like the American Urological Association and the Endocrine Society, Cochrane systematic reviews, FDA drug labelling, NIH data, and the trials themselves. Then I link them, so the claim and its evidence sit next to each other.

Where the evidence is weak, I say so, and I try to say how it’s weak, small samples, no control arm, surrogate outcomes, findings that evaporate when badly-run studies are excluded. “We don’t really know” is a legitimate answer and it appears on this site more than once.

Why that’s unusual

Most content in this category is written by companies that sell the answer, or by content farms rewriting each other. Both leave out the same things: the studies that failed, the difference between the condition you’re worried about and the one being marketed to you, and the honest admission that a question isn’t settled.

My article on fertility supplements leads with a 2,370-man NIH trial that found no benefit from the two most-sold ingredients, and higher sperm DNA fragmentation in the supplement group than in placebo. Those products are the obvious way to monetise a site with this name. I published the trial instead. That’s not a boast, it’s the operating standard, and it’s written down.

Medical review

No article on this site has been reviewed by a clinician, and none claims to have been.

I will never put a generic “medically reviewed by our expert team” line on something no clinician has read. If there’s no reviewer named, no reviewer reviewed it, and you should weigh what you read accordingly. If I ever engage one, they’ll be named with their credentials and you’ll know exactly what they checked.

How this is funded

It isn’t, yet. There are no affiliate links, no advertising and nothing for sale — every outbound link on this site is a citation, and the hosting comes out of my pocket. The full accounting is here. No company pays for coverage, sees an article before it publishes, or influences what I conclude.

What I won’t do

  • Sell you a supplement
  • Fabricate a medical reviewer or a credential
  • Use shame or fear to sell anything
  • Publish testimonials or before-and-after photos
  • Pretend a question is settled when it isn’t

Contact

Corrections, questions, or a study I’ve missed: bill@bigdickpills.com

If something here is wrong, tell me. I’ll fix it and say what changed.