Every clinical claim on this site is linked to a guideline, an FDA label, a Cochrane review or a trial. The tables behind those claims are published here as CSV and JSON under a Creative Commons licence, for your own research, reporting or product. No signup, no API key, no rate limit.
- 25 guideline statements
- 137 coded claims
- 4 PDE5 inhibitors
- 8 testosterone routes
- CC BY 4.0
Editorial assessment
Can I reuse this data, and what is it actually good for?
Yes: every table is published as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0, with no signup and no key, as long as you credit Big Dick Pills and link back.
That is 25 AUA guideline statements with their recommendation strength and evidence grade kept separate (none rests on Grade A; two on B, fourteen on C, nine carry no grade at all), a 137-claim audit of what ED clinic and publisher pages say about shockwave, PRP and stem-cell therapy (49.6% leave out that the treatment is investigational; commercial clinics 62%, publishers 17%), and two label-fact tables: the four PDE5 inhibitors by dose, onset and half-life, and the eight approved testosterone routes by schedule, level pattern and each label’s main warning.
The most useful thing in here is not the drug tables, it is the grade column. A treatment page that quotes the guideline without its grade is telling you half the story; put the grade next to the claim and most marketing copy deflates on its own. The audit table is the second most useful: it is one reader applying a written rule to 90 pages, and you can re-run it on any page in about a minute. Keep the checked date next to any figure you copy, and re-pull before you publish.
My read of the verified data on this page. Disagree or spot an error? Tell Will.
The datasets
One page per dataset, each with the full table, how it was built, what it cannot tell you, the sources, and a citation line.
-
25 statements
AUA ED guideline, graded
Every statement in the AUA erectile dysfunction guideline: treatment, what it says, recommendation strength and evidence grade (A, B, C or ungraded).
/data/aua-ed-guideline-evidence.json -
137 claims
ED treatment claims audit
The per-claim coding table behind the audit: page, publisher type, therapy and whether the page says the treatment is investigational. Reproduces every figure in the write-up.
/data/ed-treatment-claims-audit.json -
4 drugs
PDE5 inhibitors compared
Sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil and avanafil from their FDA labels: usual doses, onset, half-life, useful window, plus the head-to-head trial result.
/data/pde5-inhibitors-compared.json -
8 routes
Testosterone formulations
Injections, gel, patch, nasal, oral and pellets: dosing schedule, how flat the levels stay, and each label’s main catch, from prescribing information.
/data/testosterone-formulations.json -
432 products
FDA tainted-product notices
Every sexual-enhancement product on the FDA’s tainted-product list found to hide an undeclared drug ingredient (usually sildenafil or tadalafil), 16 May 2012 to present.
/data/fda-tainted-sexual-enhancement-products.json
Licence and citation
These datasets are released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. You may copy, redistribute, transform and build on them, including commercially, as long as you credit Big Dick Pills and link back. The underlying facts (what a guideline says, what a label says) belong to no one.
https://bigdickpills.com/data/
How the data is produced
Every row originates in an article on this site, where it was recorded from the guideline, the FDA label or the trial at the time of writing; the datasets are generated from those articles, so a correction on the page flows into the data. Each record carries its source, and the page it came from carries the date it was last checked. Nothing is modelled or estimated: where a label gives no figure, the field says so.
The audit table is different in kind. It is original research, one reader coding 90 pages against a written rule in September 2026, and it is published in full so the coding can be checked.
Known limits
- A grade is not a verdict. A low evidence grade means thin trials, not a treatment that fails; a strong recommendation on Grade C evidence is the panel’s judgement. The table shows both so you can see which is which.
- Label facts are population facts. Doses, half-lives and adverse-event percentages are the label’s figures for the standard dose; they say nothing about your kidneys, your other medicines or your prescriber’s choice.
- The audit is one sample, one month. It measures whether a page says the words, not whether the treatment works. Re-run it and tell us if you get a materially different answer.
- Coverage is deliberate, not exhaustive. We publish the tables behind articles we have written, not every drug in a class.
- Not medical advice. Written by someone who is not a doctor, per the editorial standards and the medical disclaimer.
Using this data in something public? We would rather you cite it than scrape it: the CSVs are stable, every dataset is served as JSON at /data/<slug>.json with open CORS, and the guide for AI tools is at /llms.txt.