AUA Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Dataset: All 25 Statements, With Strength and Evidence Grade

The AUA erectile dysfunction guideline reduced to its 25 statements, each with the two ratings the guideline itself keeps separate: how strongly the panel recommends it, and the grade of evidence behind it. The Evidence Card: The ED Treatment Evidence Card is the readable version with the print PDF; this page is the table, with CSV and JSON.

0 of 25

statements rest on Grade A evidence. 2 rest on Grade B, 14 on Grade C, and 9 carry no evidence grade (Clinical Principles and Expert Opinion).

Key numbers at a glance

Statements 25
Strong recommendations 4
Moderate recommendations 8
Conditional recommendations 4
Clinical Principles / Expert Opinion 6 / 3
Source Burnett AL et al., Erectile Dysfunction: AUA Guideline (2018)
Formats CSV, JSON
License CC BY 4.0, attribute Big Dick Pills
Checked 24 September 2026

All 25 statements

Wording is our plain-language summary; the strength and grade are the guideline’s own.

Treatment or action What the guideline says Recommendation strength Evidence grade
Oral PDE5 inhibitors
sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, avanafil
Should be discussed with every man with ED, unless contraindicated Strong B
PDE5i dose titration Dose should be titrated for optimal effect Strong B
PDE5i usage instructions Instructions should be given to maximise benefit Strong C
Penile prosthesis Should be discussed as a treatment option Strong C
Vacuum erection device Should be discussed as a treatment option Moderate C
Intracavernosal injections Should be discussed as a treatment option Moderate C
Morning total testosterone Should be measured in men with ED Moderate C
Lifestyle change
diet, physical activity
Improves overall health and may improve erectile function Moderate C
PDE5i plus testosterone May be more effective together in men with testosterone deficiency Moderate C
Mental health referral Should be considered to aid adherence and reduce anxiety Moderate C
Early PDE5i after prostate cancer treatment Men should be told it may not improve spontaneous function Moderate C
Penile venous surgery Not recommended Moderate C
Intraurethral alprostadil Should be discussed as a treatment option Conditional C
Penile arterial reconstruction May be considered in selected young men with focal arterial blockage Conditional C
Low-intensity shockwave therapy
LI-ESWT, acoustic wave, GAINSWave
Should be considered investigational Conditional C
Intracavernosal stem cell therapy Should be considered investigational Conditional C
Platelet-rich plasma
PRP, the “P-Shot”
Should be considered experimental Expert Opinion None (ungraded)
History, examination, selective labs Should be done in every man presenting with ED Clinical Principle None (ungraded)
ED as a cardiovascular warning Men should be counselled that ED is a risk marker for heart disease Clinical Principle None (ungraded)
In-office test before intraurethral alprostadil Should be performed Clinical Principle None (ungraded)
In-office test before injections Should be performed Clinical Principle None (ungraded)
Counselling before prosthesis surgery Post-operative expectations should be discussed Clinical Principle None (ungraded)
Prosthesis surgery during infection Should not be performed Clinical Principle None (ungraded)
Validated questionnaires Recommended to assess severity and track treatment Expert Opinion None (ungraded)
Specialised testing May be necessary in some men to guide treatment Expert Opinion None (ungraded)

How we built this

Each row is one numbered statement from the AUA guideline. The recommendation strength (Strong, Moderate, Conditional) and the evidence grade (A, B, C) are transcribed exactly as the guideline assigns them; statements the panel issued as Clinical Principles or Expert Opinion carry no grade and are marked as such rather than given one. The summary column is ours and is kept short on purpose; the guideline text is linked in the sources.

What this cannot tell you

A low evidence grade means the trials are thin, not that the treatment fails; a strong recommendation on Grade C evidence is the panel’s judgement, and the table shows both so you can see which is which. The guideline is written for clinicians treating populations. Not medical advice.

Use this data

The facts in this table (what a guideline says, what a label says, what a trial found) are not ours to own; repeat them anywhere. Our wording, table and layout are free to reuse, including commercially, under CC BY 4.0. Credit Big Dick Pills and link back; that is all we ask.

Cite as: Big Dick Pills, “AUA Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Dataset: All 25 Statements, With Strength and Evidence Grade”, bigdickpills.com/data/aua-ed-guideline-evidence/ (checked 2026-09-24). Not medical advice. All datasets.

Sources

  1. Burnett AL, Nehra A, Breau RH, et al. Erectile Dysfunction: AUA Guideline. American Urological Association, 2018. AUA
  2. Half of ED treatment pages leave out that the treatment is investigational. Big Dick Pills, 12 September 2026. The disclosure figures on this page. Method and dataset
  3. Ergun O, Kim K, Kim MH, et al. Low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 14 July 2025. Cochrane